Both kids fit in Thule seats on the back, and, yes, you can ride up to 20 miles per hour on this rig, even faster when you’re fully loaded and going downhill. My family uses a Rad Power Bike RadWagon 4, a longer, more cargo-oriented bike than the RadRunner. Not a day goes by that I don’t have thoughts of what it would be like if one of them was suddenly gone.ĭespite my anxiety about these possibilities, my wife and I are determined to give our kids the freedom that we believe was critical to our childhoods-and that includes riding bikes, both with us and alone. I have two kids, ages one and three, and without a doubt they, and my wife, are the most precious things in my life. Losing a child is the most horrible thing I can imagine.
The defendants have not filed a reply as of this writing. The lawsuit also names the helmet-maker Giro Sport Design Inc., arguing that the helmet Molly wore was defective. The suit asks for damages in an amount to be determined by a jury. “Part of their appeal is they take you places you wouldn’t normally be able to go, which includes uphill,” Olivier Taillieu, one of the lawyers who filed suit for the Steinsapirs, told the Los Angeles Times. One of the arguments the case makes is that, without the motor, the girls wouldn’t have been on the top of the hill in the first place. The bike Steinsapir was riding belonged to her friend’s 13-year-old sister.
Rad power ebike manual#
In addition, the suit claims that Rad practiced “inappropriate marketing of e-bikes to children” and did not “adequately warn about the dangers of children operating e-bikes.” The owner’s manual that comes with the bike states (on page 49 out of 57) that the bike is designed for use by people 18 and up. It’s not made clear how turning off the power would have slowed a heavy bike moving downhill, and one notable aspect of this suit is that the blame is placed entirely on the equipment. The plaintiffs also say that the surviving girl-who we’re not naming because she’s a minor-attempted to turn off the bike, but that the electrical power failed to shut down. As the suit lays out, the bike in question-the RadRunner-has “disc brakes in conjunction with a quick-release mechanism for detaching the front wheel.” This setup is common on a wide range of bikes, and the Steinsapirs claim that it is “a known safety hazard in the industry.” The suit goes on to argue that the quick release came loose as Steinsapir’s friend was applying the front brake, which allegedly caused the wheel to wobble and ultimately caused the crash. The suit claims that the bike’s design made it hard for the girls to control their speed as they sped downhill, specifically because of where the steering axis is placed in relation to the front wheel. Among other things, they’re seeking damages against Rad for selling an allegedly defective product and for death caused by negligence.
Rad power ebike trial#
On August 1, Molly’s parents, Kaye and Jonathan Steinsapir, filed a wrongful death suit in Los Angeles County against Seattle-based Rad Power Bikes, one of the country’s largest manufacturers of electric bicycles.īoth parents are also lawyers Jonathan is a trial lawyer who has represented Michael Jackson’s estate for more than a decade. Steinsapir suffered a traumatic brain injury, and, after several surgeries, died on February 15. The wreck resulted in a few scrapes and bruises for her she got up and tried to wake up Steinsapir, who lay unconscious in the street. As they descended, Steinsapir’s friend lost control of the bike and they crashed. Both wore helmets, and Steinsapir was riding on the rear rack.
On January 31, 2021, 12-year-old Molly Steinsapir climbed aboard a Rad Power RadRunner e-bike behind an 11-year-old friend, and together they rode up a hill in Pacific Palisades, California.
0 kommentar(er)
